Re: Increasing timeout of poll_query_until for TAP tests

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Increasing timeout of poll_query_until for TAP tests
Date: 2018-01-01 05:52:27
Message-ID: 20180101055227.GA2952815@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:21:03PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
> > $node_master->safe_psql('postgres',
> > "INSERT INTO tab_int VALUES (generate_series(1001,2000))");
> > my $recovery_txid =
> > $node_master->safe_psql('postgres', "SELECT txid_current()");
> > my $lsn2 =
> > $node_master->safe_psql('postgres', "SELECT pg_current_xlog_location();");
> > What I think we had better do is reverse the calls
> > pg_current_xlog_location() and txid_current() so as we are sure that
> > the LSN we track for replay is lower than the real target LSN. The
> > same problem exists when defining the timestamp target.
> >
> > The patch attached does that,
>
> Why not capture both items in a single select, such as in the attached
> patch?

> -my $recovery_time = $node_master->safe_psql('postgres', "SELECT now()");
> -my $lsn3 =
> - $node_master->safe_psql('postgres', "SELECT pg_current_xlog_location();");
> +$ret =
> + $node_master->safe_psql('postgres', "SELECT pg_current_xlog_location(), now();");
> +my ($lsn3, $recovery_time) = split /\|/, $ret;

Since now() is transaction_timestamp(), $recovery_time precedes or equals
$lsn3, and this didn't close the race. Using clock_timestamp() here would
work, as does using separate transactions like recovery-test-fixes.patch did.
I'll shortly push a fix for this and a similar ordering problem in the
standby_5 test, which first appeared subsequent to this thread.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Beena Emerson 2018-01-01 06:22:39 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2018-01-01 03:43:55 Re: Contributing with code