Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date: 2017-12-22 15:10:23
Message-ID: 20171222151023.ie4zrbgwtva7flij@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Jesper,

Jesper Pedersen wrote:

> Passes check-world here too w/ TAP + cassert.

Great, thanks for checking.

> index.c:
> [and a few other comments]

I believe these are all fixed by the attached delta patch.

If you have wording suggestions for the doc changes, please send them
along.

Thanks for reading,

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-some-fixes-per-Jesper.patch text/plain 4.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maksim Milyutin 2017-12-22 15:19:47 Re: Using ProcSignal to get memory context stats from a running backend
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2017-12-22 15:00:12 Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key