Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date: 2017-12-22 15:10:23
Message-ID: 20171222151023.ie4zrbgwtva7flij@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Jesper,

Jesper Pedersen wrote:

> Passes check-world here too w/ TAP + cassert.

Great, thanks for checking.

> index.c:
> [and a few other comments]

I believe these are all fixed by the attached delta patch.

If you have wording suggestions for the doc changes, please send them

Thanks for reading,

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-some-fixes-per-Jesper.patch text/plain 4.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maksim Milyutin 2017-12-22 15:19:47 Re: Using ProcSignal to get memory context stats from a running backend
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2017-12-22 15:00:12 Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key