Re: COMMIT TRIGGERs, take n, implemented with CONSTRAINT TRIGGERS

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: COMMIT TRIGGERs, take n, implemented with CONSTRAINT TRIGGERS
Date: 2017-09-15 19:25:08
Message-ID: 20170915192508.mup6dtj36godupoc@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2017-09-15 14:19:29 -0500, Nico Williams wrote:
> Please see my post and the linked file to see why.

The discussions here are often going to be referred back to in years, so
external links where we aren't sure about the longevity (like e.g. links
to the mailing list archive, where we're fairly sure), aren't liked
much. If you want to argue for a change, it should happen on-list.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2017-09-15 19:36:57 Re: SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Nico Williams 2017-09-15 19:19:29 Re: COMMIT TRIGGERs, take n, implemented with CONSTRAINT TRIGGERS