Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne(dot)adam(at)nokia(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Duquesne, Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre(dot)duquesne(at)nokia(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Date: 2017-08-15 02:52:43
Message-ID: 20170815025243.GA3986579@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:59:14AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne(dot)adam(at)nokia(dot)com> writes:
> > ERROR: XX000: unrecognized node type: 90
> > LOCATION: ExecReScan, execAmi.c:284
>
> (gdb) p (NodeTag) 90
> $1 = T_GatherMergeState
>
> So, apparently somebody wrote ExecReScanGatherMerge, but never bothered
> to plug it into ExecReScan. From which we may draw depressing conclusions
> about how much it's been tested.

[Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]

The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Robert,
since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
toward speedy resolution. Thanks.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-08-15 03:55:47 Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-08-15 01:30:46 Re: BUG #14775: Incorrect documentation for the Commit logical replication message format

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-08-15 02:57:42 Re: Orphaned files in base/[oid]
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-15 02:37:35 Re: Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort for describe commands, when size is printed