Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne(dot)adam(at)nokia(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Duquesne, Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre(dot)duquesne(at)nokia(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Date: 2017-08-11 15:59:14
Message-ID: 11673.1502467154@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

"Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne(dot)adam(at)nokia(dot)com> writes:
> ERROR: XX000: unrecognized node type: 90
> LOCATION: ExecReScan, execAmi.c:284

(gdb) p (NodeTag) 90
$1 = T_GatherMergeState

So, apparently somebody wrote ExecReScanGatherMerge, but never bothered
to plug it into ExecReScan. From which we may draw depressing conclusions
about how much it's been tested.

Thanks for the report!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-08-11 20:20:51 Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Previous Message Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux) 2017-08-11 15:33:22 [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sokolov Yura 2017-08-11 16:14:22 Re: Lazy hash table for XidInMVCCSnapshot (helps Zipfian a bit)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-08-11 15:45:36 Re: Request more documentation for incompatibility of parallelism and plpgsql exec_run_select