From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Augustine, Jobin" <jobin(dot)augustine(at)openscg(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
Date: | 2017-08-13 21:22:22 |
Message-ID: | 20170813212222.x7xhjjtjddkvgr3s@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-08-13 16:55:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> > I think that it's useful for these things to be handled in an
> > adversarial manner, in the same way that litigation is adversarial in
> > a common law court. I doubt that Noah actually set out to demoralize
> > anyone. He is just doing the job he was assigned.
>
> FWIW, I agree that Noah is just carrying out the RMT's task as
> assigned.
Well, then that's a sign that the tasks/process need to be rescoped.
> However, the only thing that Peter could really do about this of his own
> authority is to revert 1e8a850, which I certainly think should be the last
> resort not the first. We are continuing to make progress towards finding
> a better solution, I think, and since no particular deadline is imminent
> we should let that process play out.
I agree that that'd be a bad fix. There's other things that should, but
don't, really use the asynchronous API, e.g. postgres_fdw.
As a measure of last restart we could add a libpq workaround that forces
a pqSocketCheck() at the right moment, while still establishing a
connection. That's not good from an interruptability perspective, but
better than blocking for the entire connection establishment.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-13 21:35:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-13 21:17:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-13 21:24:59 | Re: Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-13 21:17:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |