Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "Augustine, Jobin" <jobin(dot)augustine(at)openscg(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Date: 2017-08-10 00:20:30
Message-ID: 20170810002030.3xyjtpz4fx2tiknh@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 2017-08-08 19:25:37 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 8/7/17 21:06, Noah Misch wrote:
> >> That would fit. Until v10 (commit 1e8a850), PQconnectStart() had no in-tree
> >> callers outside of libpq itself.
> > [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
> >
> > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Peter,
> > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> > item.
>
> I don't think I can usefully contribute to this. Could someone else
> take it?

I've written up a patch at
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20170806215521.d6fq4esvx7s5ejka%40alap3.anarazel.de
but I can't test this either. We really need somebody with access to
window to verify whether it works. That patch needs some adjustments as
remarked by Tom, but can be tested as is.

Regards,

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-10 00:45:53 Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-08-09 21:29:09 Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-08-10 00:22:37 Logical replication message type 'Y' is missing in docs
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2017-08-09 23:39:20 Re: Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?