| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call |
| Date: | 2017-07-28 16:56:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20170728165613.ar2wgkn74drnpidv@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-07-28 09:29:58 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:08:57PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > For me that means the policy isn't quite right. It's not like I can
> > force Tom to review the patch at a specific date. But the thread has
> > been progressing steadily over the last days, so I'm not particularly
> > concerned.
>
> Your colleagues achieve compliance despite uncertainty; for inspiration, I
> recommend examining Alvaro's status updates as examples of this. The policy
> currently governs your open items even if you disagree with it.
That's just process over substance. Publishing repeated "I'll look at
it again in $small_n days" doesn't really provide something useful.
Anyway, I'll commit it after another pass in ~1 week if it doesn't get a
review till then, but I assume it'll.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2017-07-28 17:04:59 | Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-07-28 16:35:22 | Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows |