Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption
Date: 2017-06-16 15:41:17
Message-ID: 20170616154117.GL11450@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 08:08:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 04:56:36PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > how few concerns about this feature's complexity / maintainability
> > impact have been raised.
>
> Yeah, I guess we will just have to wait to see it since other people are
> excited about it. My concern is code complexity and usability
> challenges, vs punting the problem to the operating system, though
> admittedly there are some cases where that is not possible.

I know some OS's can create file systems inside files. Can you encrypt
such file storage as non-root? I assume that is just too odd.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2017-06-16 16:04:32 Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2017-06-16 14:59:32 Re: Restrictions of logical replication