| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: PG10 pgindent run |
| Date: | 2017-05-17 01:00:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20170517010038.GA29892@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:39:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > There we go:
> > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=calliphoridae&dt=2017-05-16%2023:16:53&stg=typedefs
>
> Yup, looks good now. Thanks!
>
> BTW, comparing the typedef list to what I got a few hours ago, I see
> that "Function" is now a known type name, along with the UWhatever
> symbols from ICU. I wonder where that came from? A quick grep
> suggests that it's not going to mess anything up too badly, but it
> sure seems like a poor choice for a globally visible typedef name.
OK, I assume we are good to go for Wednesday afternoon, UTC. Thanks for
the research.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-17 01:02:19 | Re: PG10 pgindent run |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-05-17 00:54:14 | Re: PG10 pgindent run |