Re: snapbuild woes

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: snapbuild woes
Date: 2017-05-05 16:18:52
Message-ID: 20170505161852.vmjwhmum2zoar2xk@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-05-05 13:53:16 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 05/05/17 02:42, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2017-05-04 17:00:04 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> Attached is a prototype patch for that.
> >
>
> I am not sure I understand the ABI comment for started_collection_at.
> What's the ABI issue? The struct is private to snapbuild.c module. Or
> you want to store it in the ondisk snapshot as well?

It's stored on-disk already :(

> Otherwise the logic seems to be right on first read, will ponder it a
> bit more

Cool!

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-05-05 16:29:54 Re: what's up with IDENTIFIER_LOOKUP_EXPR?
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-05-05 16:10:31 Re: Row Level Security UPDATE Confusion