| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | 'Masahiko Sawada' <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh(at)ys(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hiroshi Yanagisawa <hir-yanagisawa(at)ut(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? |
| Date: | 2017-04-26 11:25:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20170426112554.GH14000@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 07:33:27AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Masahiko Sawada
> > The idea of changing the default value seems good to me but I'm not sure
> > it's good idea to change the default value now under the circumstances where
> > we're focus on stabilization.
> > Also we should update the document as well.
> >
>
> We can consider like this: the OP found a usability problem as a result of PG 10 development, so we will fix it as a stabilization work.
We did work in Postgres 10 to make replication simpler with better
defaults. This would be part of that improvement.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2017-04-26 11:52:24 | Re: [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-04-26 10:46:12 | Re: Cached plans and statement generalization |