| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remaining 2017-03 CF entries |
| Date: | 2017-04-07 19:30:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20170407193052.2oqyesrredjvu6s2@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-04-07 16:28:03 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > > - can't move to next fest because it's waiting-on-author, which doesn't
> > > allow that. Doesn't strike me as a useful restriction.
> >
> > I agree that that CF app restriction makes little sense.
>
> What the restriction means is that if a patch is in waiting-on-author,
> the proper "close" action is to return-with-feedback. There is no point
> in moving the patch to the next commitfest if there is no further patch
> version.
That's true if the patch has been in that state for a while, but if you
find some relatively minor issues, and then move it soon after, it seems
to make sense to keep it open in the next CF.
- Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-04-07 19:33:45 | Re: Remaining 2017-03 CF entries |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-04-07 19:28:03 | Re: Remaining 2017-03 CF entries |