Re: tuplesort_gettuple_common() and *should_free argument

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tuplesort_gettuple_common() and *should_free argument
Date: 2017-04-06 21:50:35
Message-ID: 20170406215035.p5ihro5yonaphhcs@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-03-13 18:14:07 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Please. You might want to hit the existing ones with a separate patch,
> >> but it doesn't much matter; I'd be just as happy with a patch that did
> >> both things.
> >
> > Got it.
>
> Attached is a patch that does both things at once.

Pushed with very minor wording changes.

Thanks,

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2017-04-06 21:52:24 Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-04-06 21:47:48 Re: BRIN cost estimate