|From:||Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>|
|Cc:||tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, david(at)fetter(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org|
|Subject:||Re: Statement timeout behavior in extended queries|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
>> I think the code needs a few clarifying comments around this, but
>> otherwise seems good. Not restarting the timeout in those cases
>> obviously isn't entirely "perfect"/"correct", but a tradeoff - the
>> comments should note that.
>> Tatsuo-san, do you want to change those, and push? I can otherwise.
> If you don't mind, could you please fix the comments and push it.
I have changed the comments as you suggested. If it's ok, I can push
the patch myself (today I have time to work on this).
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
|Next Message||Andres Freund||2017-04-04 23:38:53||Re: Statement timeout behavior in extended queries|
|Previous Message||Joe Conway||2017-04-04 22:56:28||Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql|