Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Khandekar <amit(dot)khandekar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Date: 2017-03-31 18:29:18
Message-ID: 20170331182918.GA3202@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:20:51PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > New version attached. It needs some of these problem cases added
> > to the testing, and a mention in the docs that only C and plpgsql
> > triggers can use the feature so far. I'll add those tomorrow.
>
> Done and attached.
>
> Now the question is, should it be pushed?

Yes. Among other things, that'll get it buildfarm tested and give
people interested in other PLs better visibility.

That, and I suspect that people will start using this infrastructure
for some very cool projects.

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-03-31 18:32:50 Re: Allow to specify #columns in heap/index_form_tuple
Previous Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2017-03-31 18:28:10 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.