| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade loses security lables and COMMENTs on blobs |
| Date: | 2017-02-28 01:44:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20170228014440.GD11339@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:36:37AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> All,
>
> * Stephen Frost (sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net) wrote:
> > Just wanted to get a note out to -hackers about the issue, I'll see
> > about getting a fix written up for it soon.
>
> Attached is a patch which addresses this issue. I'm not terribly
> pleased with it, but I also haven't got any great ideas of what else to
> do. Suggestions welcome, of course.
>
> Otherwise, I'll plan to start working on the back-branch changes for
> this soon.
Yeah, this is probably the best you can do. Your analysis of how we
used to treat large objects is correct, and was never adjusted for the
changes you outlined.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2017-02-28 01:48:31 | Re: utility commands benefiting from parallel plan |
| Previous Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2017-02-28 01:42:34 | Re: utility commands benefiting from parallel plan |