Re: pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes
Date: 2017-02-17 18:13:48
Message-ID: 20170217181348.a5pnflupslw2t6xx@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> My own compilers don't generate errors either, only warnings. Maybe
> we could catch this sort of thing mechanically with a critter configured
> with -Werror as well as --disable-integer-datetimes, but I'm a tad
> hesitant to have a buildfarm machine configured with -Werror. We'd
> be raising the stakes quite a bit on keeping the code warning-free
> for a specific compiler that might prove to be picky in silly ways.
>
> But if it were a pretty mainstream compiler that hadn't shown much
> evidence of wanting to throw useless warnings, maybe that's fine.
>
> Thoughts?

Note that Thomas' compiler was using -Werror.

I think we're at a point where one gcc plus one clang animals set up
with -Werror would be a good thing to have, and keep green. In
practice, this list fulfills the role of such a compiler, only with much
higher communication overhead.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-02-17 18:15:38 Keeping pg_recvlogical's "feTimestamp" separate from TimestampTz
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-02-17 17:57:36 Re: Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY