Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function

From: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Date: 2017-01-19 15:08:59
Message-ID: 20170119090859.2a54d0cc@slate.meme.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:27:40 -0300
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> > @@ -511,10 +519,16 @@ int
> > SysLogger_Start(void)
> > {
> > pid_t sysloggerPid;
> > - char *filename;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Logging collector is not enabled. We don't know where
> > messages are
> > + * logged. Remove outdated file holding the current log
> > filenames.
> > + */
> > if (!Logging_collector)
> > + {
> > + unlink(LOG_METAINFO_DATAFILE);
> > return 0;
> > + }
>
> I thought this part was odd -- I mean, why is SysLogger_Start() being
> called if the collector is not enabled? Turns out we do it and return
> early if not enabled. But not in all cases -- there is one callsite
> in postmaster.c that avoids the call if the collector is disabled.
> That needs to be changed if we want this to work reliably.

Is this an argument for having the current_logfiles always exist
and be empty when there is no in-filesystem logfile? It always felt
to me that the code would be simpler that way.

Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-01-19 15:12:18 Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-01-19 15:06:43 Re: [PATCH] Fix minor race in commit_ts SLRU truncation vs lookups