Re: [PATCH] pgpassfile connection option

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Julian Markwort <julian(dot)markwort(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pgpassfile connection option
Date: 2016-11-20 00:04:05
Message-ID: 20161120000405.GE13284@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

All,

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> You could do something like that, I guess, but I think it might be a
> good idea to wait and see if anyone else has opinions on (1) the
> desirability of the basic feature, (2) the severity of the security
> hazard it creates, and (3) your proposed remediation method.
[...]
> Hey, everybody: chime in here...

The feature strikes me as pretty reasonable to have and the pghoard
example shows that it can be quite handy in some circumstances. I don't
see much merit behind the security concern raised- the file in question
would have to have the correct format and you would have to be
connecting to a system listed in that file for any disclosure to happen,
no? As such, I don't know that any remediation is necessary for this.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-11-20 01:56:00 Re: [sqlsmith] Crash on GUC serialization
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2016-11-19 23:49:44 Re: Improvements in psql hooks for variables