Re: Showing parallel status in \df+

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date: 2016-09-28 20:02:55
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > I cannot to imagine any use case for proposed format.
> My vote (which was not counted by Stephen) was to remove it from \df+

Oh, sorry about that, not sure how I missed it. :/

> altogether. I stand by that. People who are used to seeing the output
> in \df+ will wonder "where the heck did it go" and eventually figure it
> out, at which point it's no longer a problem. We're not breaking
> anyone's scripts, that's for sure.
> If we're not removing it, I +0 support the option of moving it to
> footers. I'm -1 on doing nothing.

This is more-or-less the same position that I have.



In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2016-09-28 20:06:57 Re: ICU integration
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-09-28 19:59:26 Re: Showing parallel status in \df+