From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
Date: | 2016-07-12 23:11:13 |
Message-ID: | 20160712231113.GC4028@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Peter Eisentraut (peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> On 7/12/16 12:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > It's sounding to me like we have consensus on this proposal to further
> > change \df+ to replace the "Source code" column with "Internal name",
> > which is prosrc for C and internal-language functions but NULL otherwise.
> >
> > If I've not heard objections by tomorrow I'll go make that change.
> >
> > Are we satisfied with telling people to use \sf to see the source code
> > for a PL function? Or should there be another variant of \df that
> > still provides source code?
>
> I'm quite fond of having the full source code show in \df+ and
I'm curious how it's useful and in what way \sf does not accomplish what
you use \df+ for. I understand that's a change, but I believe it's a
positive one and would make \df+ much more generally useful. I tend to
resort to selecting columns out of pg_proc more often than I use \df+,
which is certainly not what we're going for.
> I'm
> against removing it on short notice past beta2
We've already had to change the structure of \df+; I'm not convinced
that avoiding doing so further now, just to do so again in the next
release, is actually a better answer than changing it now.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2016-07-13 01:55:04 | Re: pg_basebackup wish list |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-07-12 22:41:22 | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |