| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Date: | 2016-07-08 14:51:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20160708145156.GM21416@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Michael Paquier
> > <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Okay. Here we go. I named the column for the parallel information "Parallelism".
>
> > Another option could be to name it as Parallel Mode.
>
> I'd go with just "Parallel", to keep it from being noticeably wider than
> any of the possible column contents. Just because you're arguing that
> \df+ output is already unreadable in non-expanded mode doesn't mean it's
> a good idea to throw away horizontal space for nothing.
Agreed.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2016-07-08 16:00:50 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-07-08 14:51:37 | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |