| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Date: | 2016-07-08 14:48:17 |
| Message-ID: | 10852.1467989297@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Okay. Here we go. I named the column for the parallel information "Parallelism".
> Another option could be to name it as Parallel Mode.
I'd go with just "Parallel", to keep it from being noticeably wider than
any of the possible column contents. Just because you're arguing that
\df+ output is already unreadable in non-expanded mode doesn't mean it's
a good idea to throw away horizontal space for nothing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-07-08 14:51:37 | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-07-08 14:43:18 | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |