Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.
Date: 2016-06-04 00:43:12
Message-ID: 20160604004312.ibwcsobu7eapimen@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-06-03 20:41:33 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> Disabling just backend_flush_after by default works for me, so let's do that.
> Though I would not elect, on behalf of PostgreSQL, the risk of enabling
> {bgwriter,checkpoint,wal_writer}_flush_after by default, a reasonable person
> may choose to do so. I doubt the community could acquire the data necessary
> to ascertain which choice has more utility.

Note that wal_writer_flush_after was essentially already enabled before,
just a lot more *aggressively*.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christophe Pettus 2016-06-04 02:10:44 HashAggregate row estimate = 200
Previous Message Noah Misch 2016-06-04 00:41:33 Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.