Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump
Date: 2016-05-06 20:19:52
Message-ID: 20160506201952.GD10850@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Stephen Frost (sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net) wrote:
>
> > > The intagg contrib modules doesn't have a .c file either, nor a
> > > MODULES_big line, and I don't see any errors with it. I'm not terribly
> > > familiar with how the Windows builds are run though.
> >
> > It looks like there's an exclude list that intagg is on for the MSVC
> > build animals, presumably because it doesn't have a .c file to be
> > compiled.
> >
> > I'm guessing the right answer here is to just add test_pg_dump to that
> > list.
>
> I don't like this solution, because it means pg_dump will get little
> testing on Windows. I agree with reverting now and figuring out a way
> to enable this test on Windows after the beta. I suggest you grab hold
> of your own Windows installation so that you can whack it locally until
> it works, rather than waiting for buildfarm cycles.

This is only for the test_pg_dump extension, which is specifically just
testing pg_dump with extensions. The vast majority of the pg_dump tests
are in src/bin/pg_dump and should be getting run on the Windows systems
(once this issue is addressed).

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-05-06 20:21:16 pgsql: More small 9.6 release note improvements.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-05-06 20:18:17 Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-05-06 20:24:47 Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-05-06 20:19:14 Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6