From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: CREATE INDEX ... INCLUDING (column[, ...]) |
Date: | 2016-04-08 18:38:37 |
Message-ID: | 20160408183837.GO10850@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> writes:
> >> CREATE INDEX ... INCLUDING (column[, ...])
> >
> > Buildfarm members that don't like // comments are dying on this bit
> > in tuplesort.c:
> >
> > state->nKeys = IndexRelationGetNumberOfKeyAttributes(indexRel); //FIXME
> >
> > I assume that the problem here is larger than just failure to adhere to
> > C89 comment style. Was this patch really ready to commit? I'm not very
> > happy that such a large patch went from "Needs review" to "Committed" in
> > the blink of an eye on the very last commitfest day ... and artifacts like
> > this aren't doing anything to increase my confidence in it.
>
> +1. I wonder if this should be reverted entirely.
This also broke pg_dump when connecting to pre-9.6 systems. That's a
pretty easy fix and I was just about to push a fix for that, but will
hold off if this is going to be reverted..
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-04-08 18:40:01 | Re: pgsql: CREATE INDEX ... INCLUDING (column[, ...]) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-08 18:31:26 | Re: pgsql: CREATE INDEX ... INCLUDING (column[, ...]) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-08 18:39:57 | Re: [PATCH v12] GSSAPI encryption support |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-08 18:37:55 | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |