From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: So, can we stop supporting Windows native now? |
Date: | 2016-03-31 08:20:16 |
Message-ID: | 20160331082016.GA23562@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-03-31 09:04:35 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> The cost is small.
First off I agree we don't want to drop proper windows support.
But I think "the cost is small" is a pretty bad mischaracterization. I
don't do windows, and yet I've spent a lot of time figuring out windows
only stuff, even writing windows only things (atomics, latches, recent
bugfixes). There's a lot of architectural gunk in postgres just geared
towards supporting windows (c.f. EXEC_BACKEND), and that makes new
development harder in a number of cases. E.g. background workers,
paralellism and such had quite some extra work cut out for them because
of that.
> but is a burden carried mainly by those who care about Windows
> support.
I don't think that's true. Tom e.g. seems to fight battles with it on a
regular base.
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-03-31 08:48:14 | Re: So, can we stop supporting Windows native now? |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-03-31 08:15:26 | Re: Missing mention of GSSAPI in MSVC's config_default.pl |