Re: pg_rewind just doesn't fsync *anything*?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: pg_rewind just doesn't fsync *anything*?
Date: 2016-03-10 19:40:14
Message-ID: 20160310194014.ns3jhaai65435t3f@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-03-10 20:31:55 +0100, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > Having to backpatch a single system() invocation + find_other_exec()
> > call, and backporting a more general FRONTEND version of initdb's
> > fsync_pgdata() are wildly differing in complexity.
>
> Talking about HEAD, wouldn't the dependency tree be cleaner if there
> is a common facility in src/common?

Yea, probably; but lets sort out the backbranches first.

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-03-10 19:41:09 Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2016-03-10 19:35:58 Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)