| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgbench small bug fix |
| Date: | 2016-03-04 18:22:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20160304182254.GA725434@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Probably it is possible, but it will sure need more that one little
> condition to be achieved... I do not think that introducing a non trivial
> distributed election algorithm involving locks and so would be a good
> decision for this very little matter.
>
> My advice is "keep it simple".
>
> If this is a blocker, I can sure write such an algorithm, when I have some
> spare time, but I'm not sure that the purpose is worth it.
You're probably right, but TBH I'm pretty unsure about this whole thing.
I will leave it alone for the time being.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-04 18:25:48 | Re: Parallel Aggregate |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-03-04 18:20:16 | Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff |