Fabien COELHO wrote:
> *-21.patch does what you suggested above, some hidden awkwardness> but much less that the previous one.
Yeah, I think this is much nicer, don't you agree?
However, this is still a bit broken -- you cannot return a stackvariable from process_file, because the stack goes away once thefunction returns. You need to malloc it.
Also, you forgot to update the comments in process_file,process_builtin, etc.
-- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services