From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Confusing with commit time usage in logical decoding |
Date: | 2016-03-01 17:18:04 |
Message-ID: | 20160301171802.6ismn7iumoaw77uw@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2016-03-01 18:09:28 +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 01/03/16 17:57, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Artur Zakirov wrote:
> >>Hello, Andres
> >>
> >>You have introduced a large replication progress tracking infrastructure
> >>last year. And there is a problem described at the link in the quote below.
> >>
> >>Attached patch fix this issue. Is this patch correct? I will be grateful if
> >>it is and if it will be committed.
> >
> >AFAICS this is clearly a bug introduced in 5aa235042:
> >
> > /* replay actions of all transaction + subtransactions in order */
> > ReorderBufferCommit(ctx->reorder, xid, buf->origptr, buf->endptr,
> >- parsed->xact_time);
> >+ commit_time, origin_id, origin_lsn);
> > }
> >
>
> Well yeah but the commit_time is set few lines above as Artur pointed out, I
> think the proposed fix is correct one.
I'd rather just initialize commit_time to parsed->xact_time.
This indeed is clearly a bug. I do wonder if anybody has a good idea
about how to add regression tests for this? It's rather annoying that
we have to suppress timestamps in the test_decoding tests, because
they're obviously not reproducible...
Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2016-03-01 17:18:35 | Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-03-01 17:13:28 | Re: Confusing with commit time usage in logical decoding |