Re: Confusing with commit time usage in logical decoding

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Confusing with commit time usage in logical decoding
Date: 2016-03-01 17:13:28
Message-ID: 20160301171328.GA357017@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 01/03/16 17:57, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Artur Zakirov wrote:
> >>Hello, Andres
> >>
> >>You have introduced a large replication progress tracking infrastructure
> >>last year. And there is a problem described at the link in the quote below.
> >>
> >>Attached patch fix this issue. Is this patch correct? I will be grateful if
> >>it is and if it will be committed.
> >
> >AFAICS this is clearly a bug introduced in 5aa235042:
> >
> > /* replay actions of all transaction + subtransactions in order */
> > ReorderBufferCommit(ctx->reorder, xid, buf->origptr, buf->endptr,
> >- parsed->xact_time);
> >+ commit_time, origin_id, origin_lsn);
> > }
> >
>
> Well yeah but the commit_time is set few lines above as Artur pointed out, I
> think the proposed fix is correct one.

Err, yes, that's exactly what I am saying. Sorry for being unclear.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-03-01 17:18:04 Re: Confusing with commit time usage in logical decoding
Previous Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2016-03-01 17:10:20 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.