Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean
Date: 2016-02-11 14:54:13
Message-ID: 20160211145413.7pgme6ae74mqqnvs@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-02-11 09:51:26 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I have never been quite clear on what you think is going to cause
> stdbool.h inclusions to become more common.

Primarily because it's finally starting to be supported across the
board, thanks to MS finally catching up.

Then there's uglyness like:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/508bd3a0-b0a1-4f10-ad9c-2f86656f6e79%40postgrespro.ru

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2016-02-11 14:56:04 Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-02-11 14:53:36 Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex