Re: snapshot too old, configured by time

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: snapshot too old, configured by time
Date: 2016-02-01 22:18:21
Message-ID: 20160201221821.GA100607@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner wrote:

> > There has been a review but no replies for more than 1 month. Returned
> > with feedback?
>
> I do intend to post another version of the patch to tweak the
> calculations again, after I can get a patch in to expand the
> testing capabilities to allow an acceptable way to test the patch
> -- so I put it into the next CF instead.

Two months passed since this, and no activity. I'm closing this as
returned-with-feedback now; you're of course free to resubmit to
2016-03.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-02-01 22:25:41 Re: [PROPOSAL] Client Log Output Filtering
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-02-01 22:05:40 Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.