Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex
Date: 2016-01-12 15:51:57
Message-ID: 20160112155157.GA814005@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-01-11 21:16:42 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Andres, Robert, are you still reviewing this patch?
>
> I don't think I've signed to - or actually did - reviewed this path.

Well, maybe not as such, but you replied to the thread several times,
which is why I asked. No problem, you don't *have* to review all
patches.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2016-01-12 15:52:14 Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2016-01-12 15:27:59 pgbench doc typos