Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex
Date: 2016-01-12 11:45:04
Message-ID: 20160112114503.fcm7quf7zjaovwkv@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-01-11 21:16:42 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres, Robert, are you still reviewing this patch?

I don't think I've signed to - or actually did - reviewed this path.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2016-01-12 11:49:11 Re: Odd behavior in foreign table modification (Was: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW)
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2016-01-12 11:38:26 Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102