Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages
Date: 2016-01-07 15:27:46
Message-ID: 20160107152746.GK7650@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Process-wise, I don't understand why is Andres mentioned as co-author.
> Did he actually wrote part of the patch, or advised on the design?
> Who is reviewing the patch?

It's extracted & extended from BDR, where I added that feature (to
implement distributed locking).

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-01-07 15:30:51 Re: Re: Generalizing SortSupport for text to work with char(n), bytea, and alternative opclasses
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2016-01-07 15:24:07 Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS