| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages |
| Date: | 2016-01-07 15:24:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20160107152406.GA423183@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Petr Jelinek wrote:
> These messages just create WAL record with arbitrary data as specified by
> user. For standard WAL reply, these are basically noop, but in logical
> decoding they are be decoded and the special callback of the output plugin
> is be called for them.
I had a quick look at this and I couldn't find anything worthy of
comment -- seems a reasonably straightforward addition to stuff that's
mostly already there.
Process-wise, I don't understand why is Andres mentioned as co-author.
Did he actually wrote part of the patch, or advised on the design?
Who is reviewing the patch?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-01-07 15:24:07 | Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-01-07 15:12:23 | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing |