Re: checkpointer continuous flushing

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Date: 2016-01-07 11:55:03
Message-ID: 20160107115503.kniyrdb3nf7ftvf3@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-01-07 12:50:07 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >But more importantly: You designed the API to be generic because you
> >wanted it to be usable for other purposes as well. And for that it
> >certainly needs to deal with that.
>
> Yes, I'm planning to try to do the minimum possible damage to the current
> API to fix the issue.

What's your thought there? Afaics it's infeasible to do the flushing tat
the fd.c level.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2016-01-07 12:07:33 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2016-01-07 11:50:07 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing