| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, brown(at)fastmail(dot)com, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #13741: vacuumdb does not accept valid password |
| Date: | 2015-12-23 16:55:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20151223165544.GB58441@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Sorry for having lost track of this. I think if we're going to do this,
> we should do it now not later, because it essentially reverts the
> connectDatabase() API change made in 83dec5a71 in favor of a different API
> change with the same purpose. Now, that doesn't matter if no third-party
> code is using connectDatabase(), but I have a suspicion that there
> probably is some. Any such users will not thank us for whacking
> connectDatabase's API around in 9.5 and then whacking it around
> differently in 9.6.
>
> In short, I think we should apply this now and back-patch into 9.5,
> like the prior patch, even though we're post-RC1. The reduction in
> cross-version API churn is worth it.
>
> If no objections, I'll go do that shortly.
No objection here.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2015-12-23 18:18:02 | Re: BUG #13830: pg_table_size and pg_indexes_size |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-23 16:44:53 | Re: BUG #13741: vacuumdb does not accept valid password |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2015-12-23 17:08:40 | Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-23 16:44:53 | Re: BUG #13741: vacuumdb does not accept valid password |