Re: bugs and bug tracking

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:39:16AM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
> On 10/13/2015 08:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> >>On 2015-10-13 16:21:54 +0200, �lvaro Hern�ndez Tortosa wrote:
> >>>(50 chars for the commit summary, 72 chars line wrapping)
> >
> >>-1 - imo 50 chars too often makes the commit summary too unspecific,
> >>requiring to read much more.
> >
> >I agree --- I have a hard enough time writing a good summary in 75
> >characters. 50 would be awful.
>
> The idea of writing a commit message that is useful in a number of
> characters that is less than half a tweet sounds unbearable. The
> idea of trying to discern what the hell a commit actually is in a
> number of characters that is less than half a tweet sounds
> completely ridiculous.
>
> -1 on that particular aspect.

FYI, I think we already have two limits for the first line summary of
commit messages. The limits are 64 for commit message subjects and 50
characters for gitweb summary pages --- anything longer is truncated.

My commit template shows me the limits as I am typing the commit text to
remind me of the limits:

-- email subject limit -----------------------------------------
-- gitweb summary limit --------------------------

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +