Re: bugs and bug tracking

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bugs and bug tracking
Date: 2015-10-07 18:20:21
Message-ID: 20151007182021.GH3685@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> So in the pipermail interface you get the impression that after three
> messages the thread stopped. But if you go to
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797804
> you realize that there's further traffic in the bug that wasn't sent to
> the list. That's ungood.

As Andres noted, the messages all went to the list, it's just that they
crossed a month boundary and the rest of the thread is in October.

Per Don, generally speaking, the only emails that *don't* get sent to
the Maintainer email address are ones which are explicitly sent to the
special 'nnn-quiet(at)bugs' email address, which is available specifically
to allow maintainers to add info without having it be sent back out to
the maintainer address.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-10-07 18:20:30 Re: bugs and bug tracking
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2015-10-07 18:20:06 Re: bugs and bug tracking