From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: bugs and bug tracking |
Date: | 2015-10-07 18:05:27 |
Message-ID: | 20151007180527.GF4405@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 10:25 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Hmm, I guess we could have the bug form add
> > To: NNN(at)bugs(dot)postgresql(dot)org
> > CC: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > as headers, which should work for most people (since we reply-all), Josh
> > Berkus being the exception.
>
> Well, this will just give you more opportunities to ignore me.
Currently, it just means I have to look harder for stuff you post -- I
certainly do not ignore you. I worry that in the future it might mean
your messages don't make it to the "bug threads", if we have such a
thing. See my followup to Stephen,
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20151007175841.GE4405%40alvherre.pgsql
where some traffic was not present in the mailing list archives but it
does appear in the bug report itself. I think we need to make it very
hard for that to happen, and lack of CCs might become a problem.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-10-07 18:08:03 | Re: bugs and bug tracking |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-10-07 18:00:55 | Re: bugs and bug tracking |