From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Shouldn't CREATE TABLE LIKE copy the relhasoids property? |
Date: | 2015-10-06 01:19:51 |
Message-ID: | 20151006011951.GC9634@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:48:04PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 09:15:49AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > It seems to me that waiting for 9.6 for what's arguably a bug fix is too
> > > much. It's not like this is a new feature. Why don't we just make sure
> > > it is as correct as possible and get it done for 9.5? It's not even in
> > > beta yet, nor feature freeze.
> >
> > Well, I applied what I thought would work, but did not handle three
> > cases:
> >
> > * checking of hasoids by index specifications
> > * queries with multiple LIKE'ed tables
> > * matching inheritance behavior
> >
> > I am unclear if I should be addressing such complex issues at this point
> > in the development cycle. I can certainly apply this patch, but I need
> > someone else to tell me it is good and should be applied. I am also
> > thinking such review time would be better spent on patches submitted
> > long before mine.
>
> I have added regression tests to the patch, attached. I have included
> Tom's test that doesn't directly use LIKE.
Patch applied.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zhaomo Yang | 2015-10-06 02:09:29 | Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING |
Previous Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2015-10-05 23:56:40 | Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS |