Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:31:44AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > As Noah I think it'd be good if we, over time, started to document a few
> > more things one currently have to pick up over time. I'm wondering
> > whether these should be subsections under a new sect1 ('Code Structure'?
> > Don't like that much), or all independent sect1s.
>
> "Structure" is certainly not what this material is. Maybe "Miscellaneous
> Coding Conventions" is the best we can do for a title. The items seem too
> short to be their own <sect1>'s.

"C Language Features" comes to mind. I assume we're talking about names for a
<sect1> inside <chapter id="source">.

> > That's not yet perfect, but shows what I'm thinking of. Comments?
>
> Needs a bit of copy-editing in places, but +1 overall.

+1