| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
| Date: | 2015-08-27 15:31:44 |
| Message-ID: | 16566.1440689504@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> As Noah I think it'd be good if we, over time, started to document a few
> more things one currently have to pick up over time. I'm wondering
> whether these should be subsections under a new sect1 ('Code Structure'?
> Don't like that much), or all independent sect1s.
"Structure" is certainly not what this material is. Maybe "Miscellaneous
Coding Conventions" is the best we can do for a title. The items seem too
short to be their own <sect1>'s.
> That's not yet perfect, but shows what I'm thinking of. Comments?
Needs a bit of copy-editing in places, but +1 overall.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-08-27 16:24:23 | Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-08-27 15:12:42 | Re: What does RIR as in fireRIRrules stand for? |