Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date: 2015-08-27 15:31:44
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> As Noah I think it'd be good if we, over time, started to document a few
> more things one currently have to pick up over time. I'm wondering
> whether these should be subsections under a new sect1 ('Code Structure'?
> Don't like that much), or all independent sect1s.

"Structure" is certainly not what this material is. Maybe "Miscellaneous
Coding Conventions" is the best we can do for a title. The items seem too
short to be their own <sect1>'s.

> That's not yet perfect, but shows what I'm thinking of. Comments?

Needs a bit of copy-editing in places, but +1 overall.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-08-27 16:24:23 Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-08-27 15:12:42 Re: What does RIR as in fireRIRrules stand for?