| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TAP tests are badly named |
| Date: | 2015-08-01 23:20:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20150801232058.GE1646402@tornado.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 07:13:04PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 08/01/2015 04:44 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> >>>--enable-tap-tests is a reasonable configuration setting, because it's
> >>>about whether or not we have a TAP testing framework available, but I
> >>>think we should stop calling the bin tests "TAP tests" and we should
> >>>change the test name in vcregress.pl to a more appropriate name. In the
> >>>buildfarm I'm calling the step "bin-check": <http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2015-07-30%2012%3A25%3A58&stg=bin-check>
> >>>
> >>>Thoughts?
> >While lack of granularity in vcregress.pl is hostile, with so much about MSVC
> >development being hostile, this one is below my noise floor.
>
>
> Speaking with my buildfarm hat on, it's well above mine. And these changes
> make the situation worse quite gratuitously. Anyway, I'll fix it.
Sounds good. I'll be interested to read your design.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-08-01 23:22:53 | Re: upgrade failure from 9.5 to head |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2015-08-01 23:13:05 | Re: upgrade failure from 9.5 to head |