Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)
Date: 2015-06-26 19:09:03
Message-ID: 20150626190903.GC19129@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-06-24 16:41:48 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> I, by now, have come to a different conclusion. I think it's time to
> entirely drop the renegotiation support.

I think by now we essentially concluded that we should do that. What I'm
not sure yet is how: Do we want to rip it out in master and just change
the default in the backbranches, or do we want to rip it out in all
branches and leave a faux guc in place in the back branches. I vote for
the latter, but would be ok with both variants.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-06-26 19:10:48 Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-06-26 19:07:59 Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server